Some Environmentalists Say Glen Canyon Dam Plan Doesn't Do Enough For Endangered Species
The U.S. Interior Department has come up with a way to manage the Glen Canyon Dam for the next two decades.
The plan released October 7 would provide water and power for its many customers in the West, while attempting to protect the environment in the Grand Canyon downstream.
When water is released from the dam to create hydropower, beaches along the Colorado River erode leaving little habitat for endangered fish or protection for cultural resources. In addition, the water temperature at the base of the dam is much colder than it was before the dam was built.
Researchers have studied the dam’s impacts downstream for the last 24 years. In recent years, dam operators have released high flows in attempts to rebuild some of the beaches.
Under the new plan the federal government will continue the high flows and replace some of the fish that have died.
The seven states that rely on the Colorado River as a water source, the power companies and the Navajo Nation have supported the new plan.
Environmentalists including Save The Colorado said the impact statement doesn’t comply with federal law. The group said the new plan would not “recover” the endangered fish and it doesn’t address climate change impacts on the river.
The Interior Department will make a final record of decision after a month-long public review.
